tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7490741548532838419.post1986975641870093793..comments2023-12-19T11:35:51.506-05:00Comments on horzepa: using WIDE1-1,WIDE2-1Stan Horzepahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13789680159370812959noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7490741548532838419.post-81958607808204891702006-06-04T17:59:27.000-04:002006-06-04T17:59:27.000-04:00One of these days I hope to get into ARPS. I'...One of these days I hope to get into ARPS. I've been having a hard time finding the time to sit down and really learn it!<br><br>Justin<br>KB3JUVJustin Kates KB3JUVhttp://www.kb3juv.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7490741548532838419.post-45350667762734567052006-06-05T14:42:29.000-04:002006-06-05T14:42:29.000-04:00[...] In my blog entry for May 31, I wrote about m...[...] In my blog entry for May 31, I wrote about my roadtrip to New Hampshire with APRS running in Land Barge II, :The TH-D7(G) indicated that its APRS packets were being digipeated throughout the roundtrip, but when I arrived home and checked the APRS track on the Internet, it showed a gap between Greenfield, MA, and Brattleboro, VT, and a complete lack of Internet coverage north of Claremont, NH.” [...]wa1lou was here » Blog Archive » Roadtrip Reduxhttp://horzepa.com/blog/?p=136noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7490741548532838419.post-81361439092693870412006-06-14T17:02:57.000-04:002006-06-14T17:02:57.000-04:00Since changing our Digis & home set-ups to the...Since changing our Digis & home set-ups to the new Pardigm, our local tracking is terrible compared to the old way. Cannot get home stations set up correctly to digipeat for some reason.<br><br>Charlie, K4ITVCharlie, K4ITVnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7490741548532838419.post-51364428005965727232007-01-16T18:33:47.000-05:002007-01-16T18:33:47.000-05:00I've been looking for an explanation for this ...I've been looking for an explanation for this and haven't seen a good one yet:<br><br>Why is "WIDE1-1,WIDE2-1" any different from "WIDE2-2"?<br><br>Is it because "fill-in" digis are usually programmed to accept only "WIDE1-X" packets?<br><br>Otherwise, wouldn't a "WIDE1-1,WIDE2-1" packet be digipeated the same as a "WIDE2-2" packet, as a "WIDE2-1" packet?<br><br>If fill-in digis are usually programmed to accept only WIDE1-X packets I can see the benefits, because it would prevent them from even repeating any WIDE2-1 packets received from local "master" digis.<br><br>This would be worth answering in QST!Wiley KF6IIUnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7490741548532838419.post-35901199381278403702009-12-23T09:40:55.000-05:002009-12-23T09:40:55.000-05:00What is the difference between wide1, wide2, wide3...What is the difference between wide1, wide2, wide3, etc?Brucenoreply@blogger.com